Sunday, September 7, 2014
Is taste a human right iii
Am I alone in resorting to prose
from the kitchen, when I wish to
experience clarity? I wasn't dis-
paraging Philosophy, the other
day, in cautioning against claim-
ing too much for it; pleasure and
clarity may be acquainted but en-
joy their independence. So, too,
the other muses, seldom unself-
interested enough to afford that
suspension of argument, which I
take to be a principal property
of clarity as I recognize it. I
listen to my dog, lapping fresh
water from his porcelain after an
outing; and to internalise this harmony, I read of well-tem-
pered endive in Elizabeth David.
She has a genius very different, I think, from the mis-exalted acts of arousing hunger, of propounding rules, consoling vanities, and inspiring ambitions. Hers is for extruding the impacted impulses of gratitude, in a natural solicitude for the inherent blessings of in-gredients. Hers is the wonder of
an innocent for clarity.
I think, to celebrate her famously unintimidated opinions, much less to embrace them as some acolyte, is to misrepresent the fundamental composure which lies at their root, as a compost of questions laid not merely to rest, but to illuminate. Is this even about food?
Thus when Galileo speaks of the alphabet,
he means a combinatory system capable of
representing everything in the universe.
Here too we see him introducing the com-
parison with painting: the combination
of the letters .. is the equivalent of
mixing colours on the palette. It is
clear that this is a combinatory system
of a different order [from others] .. a
combination of objects which are already
endowed with meaning .. cannot represent
all of of reality; in order to achieve
this one needs to turn to a combinatory
system of minimal elements such as pri-
mary colours or the letters ..
And when we get home,
there will be bright,
fair music to imbibe.
Italo Calvino
Why Read the Classics?
The Book of Nature
in Galileo
Martin McLaughlin
translation
Jonathan Cape, 1999©
No comments:
Post a Comment