Friday, February 1, 2019
Hitchcock discovers the extra man
Who better, may one remark,
than the world-class master
of shock in cinema, discov-
ering a floppy tuxedo hand-
kerchief as early as the 19
thirties, in that consensus
niche of awe, Saint Moritz,
for a furtive fertilization
of his harvest of endanger-
ment, to bring to that fore
such a conspicuous yet sec-
ret signal of a stereotype?
The Man Who Knew Too Much -
in a mere 75 minutes of ex-
tremely censored cinema, in
its 1934 incarnation - tugs
one into a spiraling vortex
of complacent complicity in
the prevalence of this mis-
construction. He notices an
adaptive, upright diligence
in males of the floral poc-
ket outpouring, as vigilan-
tes of social protection, a
rĂ´le we see here and there,
today, in cotillion boards.
Who can prefer, being swept
under the rug by a thuggish
liberation program, to that
undying gush of dissidence,
if revived in its image for
several moments, now and a-
gain, of daring effrontery?
The elation of discovery is
always of candid confusion.
Mr Hitchcock played stereo-
type against type, and this
shows us a man with an eye,
who requires to be watched.
Florian Luger
Alfred Hitchcock
director
The Man Who Knew
Too Much
Charles Bennett and
D.B. Wyndham-Lewis
screenplay
Alfred Junge
art direction
Gaumont, 1934©
Tuesday, January 29, 2019
The temptations of Robert Mueller
Believe me, I completely agree that
it is a little sick-o to empathize
with the trials of a prosecutor,
especially for the thrilling sensa-
tion he suffers, in the depths of
his diligence, of reaching an end.
Has the ceremony been extended, to
satisfy the most vigorous demands
to reflect the spirit of the laws,
or appease a rising lawless lust?
How the worry gathers as the laces
overlap, their climax now so immin-
ent, as almost to entrap. And yet,
what could be more expedient for
continuing his work, than the im-
pudent call, off-stage, for the
publication of his discoveries,
as of a Clown Executioner of sus-
pects who cannot be convicted?
What servant of the law would un-
dertake investigations framed by
due process, only to turn over
raw data to the tender mercies
of political schism and journal-
istic hustlers? Not even Eurip-
ides loosed the Bacchae on such
a corrupt demand for justice. It
would fail the laws of tragedy.
Monday, January 28, 2019
Jonas Mekas: Was it this week, or last?
Jonas Mekas, born in Lithuania 1922,
died this week in New York. But may-
be he died last week, depending on
whether January 23rd belongs to the
present 7 days, or the previous ones.
Imprecision presents itself repeat-
edly in recalling his fruitful life.
A figure held in high and affection-
ate regard in film circles, poetic
circles, autobiographical circles,
and fashionable social circles in
New York for nearly seventy years,
his obituaries capture a widespread
admiration for a sensitive strand
of artistic integrity, and for pro-
fessions of feeling with a delicate
reticence of style. Two examples,
both drawn from The New York Times,
are linked below.
As it happens, the principal works
by or about himself were revisited
in The New York Review of Books only
last June, by a doctoral candidate at
UCLA, and (as frequently happens at
this excellent periodical) that first
presentation led to a spirited ex-
change of views, five weeks later.
They, too, are linked below.
The lives of so many Lithuanians,
to say nothing of published intel-
lectuals, to say even less of men
in their young 20's, were lost in
the 1940s in that bloodland, in
Timothy Snyder's apt description,
that Jonas Mekas' American career
owed much to his memories of his
own ordeals there, even as he "al-
ways made a point of his devotion
to the present." No one can doubt,
the times would have left a mark.
The key to its outlines, although
necessarily ambiguous to a degree,
lies in the central reality so im-
pressively documented by Snyder -
the rivalry of two savage dictator-
ships for the same dwindling lives.
In a personal letter to the scholar
at UCLA, whose article is indispen-
sable reading on "the authority of
a witness [without] the responsib-
ility of one," Mekas addresses the
strain encapsulated in historian
Eric Hobsbawm's exacting phrase,
the need to protest against forget-
ting. What Mekas has to say is on-
ly perfectly chilling in this hour
in the United States:
You are talking about difficulty
to acknowledge the facts. No, it's
not for me, not at all. What's dif-
ficult is the remembering of the
facts themselves. Because there
were "facts"; life consists of
"facts," but each of us concentrates
in our lives only on certain "facts,"
closest to each of us. The rest pass-
es unnoticed, not essential to one's
existence, slips our of memory.
Jonas Mekas
Kassel, 1946
Associated Press
Jonas Mekas, 'Godfather'
of Avant-Garde, Dies at 96
The New York Times
January 23, 2019
Manohla Dargis
Jonas Mekas: A Poet
with a Movie Camera
The New York Times
January 27, 2019
Michael Casper
I Was There
The New York Review
of Books
June 7, 2018
Barry Schwabsky
and Michael Casper
On Jonas Mekas
An Exchange
The New York Review
of Books
July 19, 2018
Timothy Snyder
Bloodlands
Europe Between
Hitler and Stalin
Basic Books, 2010©
Eric Hobsbawm
On History
The New Press, 1997©