tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4751850602006071202.post792979372095928528..comments2024-02-19T20:45:03.110-05:00Comments on Red Mug, Blue Linen : On longing for a worldLaurenthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17972899387484460347noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4751850602006071202.post-47336502819895065042011-02-07T08:13:32.551-05:002011-02-07T08:13:32.551-05:00Well, you're certainly a sight for sore eyes. ...Well, you're certainly a sight for sore eyes. Where were you, when the page was being gored for naughtiness? And here, I'd thought you were running a nice little muleta for me of interference.<br /><br />Cheers, it's Monday ~Laurenthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17972899387484460347noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4751850602006071202.post-62038739714955191452011-02-07T07:28:01.303-05:002011-02-07T07:28:01.303-05:00I am following!
and I like your spirit and your fl...I am following!<br />and I like your spirit and your flame (Flamme I ment)!<br /><br />;-)Tassoshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17260499348865779208noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4751850602006071202.post-29228719609029948732011-02-07T05:05:36.087-05:002011-02-07T05:05:36.087-05:00Yet, still, David, a plausible mountain range in a...Yet, still, David, a plausible mountain range in a remote area south of Vancouver. There was a brewery named for it, and once a nice hotel.<br /><br />Now, then, we come to RD's observation - which turns on a tone so variable in its adjective, as to subject its interpretation to wish-fulfillment. Resisting any implication of "zingy goddydarling naughty," we are left with "baddydoggy smacky naughty." I'm afraid he's quite right under either heading, but to be hung for a sheep seems wiser on this occasion, than to go as a lamb. I shall save my Belgians for lighter times.<br /><br />Rather than trifling with the layout of this entry I amended it with a clarifying third (3rd) illustration and comment, so that the first one's native point would not be lost. The leg is the subject. An extensive feature, it can scarcely be appraised without reference to its capital and engine, particularly where motility is relevant. We experienced a like circumstance in the discussion of the Blue Fox, whose frogs legs would have been meagre, indeed, without reference to this ingenious sector. Partisans of Muybridge will take the point.<br /><br />I draw everyone's attention, then, to the 3rd figure's traversal of the bridge, both as further good faith in illustration of this simple argument, and as a plausible tour-d'horison of the feature in question.<br /><br />This will have been the 2nd time in a week or so, when a reader's astute comment has left a whipt dog a wiser dog - an instructional mode we abjure here, to preserve some discrepancy in our own favour. I'm happy to edit under any such guidance. <br /><br />But RD would probably not have come to this same finding, IF the original title of the entry had been retained. That original title had been the germ of this entry rather than what we see here, its summary. That title was, "Who's following, who's missing," and so the backward glancing face was the very expression of that inquiry.<br /><br />Almost by itself, this blog seems to have coined the term, "gratuitous." Oh, you can't know how frequently the epithet bounces down the stairsteps of an illustrative stack in this place. I shall likely hear it again for this poor illustration, when in fact its presence continues to make sense to one, as calling forth "the" question of the day -- even without the direct mode of address, for which it was ideally suited. Or unsuited, but still suitable.<br /><br />I certainly don't mean to make light of a reader's judgment or taste, particularly where such visits so enrich the place. I hope this explanation of the picture's presence is helpful; I know I can't expect it to seem un-naughty. And I do not mean to inquire, in which way.Laurenthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17972899387484460347noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4751850602006071202.post-36071814905417498782011-02-06T20:59:26.185-05:002011-02-06T20:59:26.185-05:00That first picture is very naughty, Laurent!That first picture is very naughty, Laurent!Reggie Darlinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04044215790585354363noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4751850602006071202.post-8065526579152767622011-02-06T20:47:29.273-05:002011-02-06T20:47:29.273-05:00If it were not for men desiring to run and race ea...If it were not for men desiring to run and race each other Olympia would be naught!David Tomshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13181690917362173400noreply@blogger.com