On the day following the apparent
election of the American strongman,
to a questioner, that she would ex-
pect to enjoy a merry co-operation
with the United States, but only on
the basis of democracy, freedom and
respect for the law and the dignity
of man, independent of origin, skin
color, religion, gender, sexual or-
ientation or political views.
Anticipating our strongman's ascent
next month, I'm glad not to have to
spell the word, kindergarten, again.
As we watch the hoary domicile of the
Executive Branch being marked down in
gold leaf, and spritzed with whatever
glitz its tenant snaffled in halcyon
years at Studio 54, to invigorate the
spasms of his 140-character conscious-
ness - all injections aside - we un-
derstand that speculation on his con-
duct is essentially medical, and not
epistemological in the slightest.
We look, then, to the afterlife of a
forebear of his aspects, from temper-
ament to inclination: to a four-acre
memorial in the middle of the German
Chancellor's capital city, to circum-
stances we have always understood to
have been, foreseeable. As the arch-
itect says, You pray for accidental
results. But in monuments this suc-
cessful, as in Maya Lin's gash in
the ground off Constitution Avenue,
The American strongman may posture,
all he likes, as a swaggering Joshua
of the West Bank, because he never
will understand why the world, with
this nation's indispensable blessing,
conceded lands previously disputed to
a people subjected to one strong man,
one exceptional nation too many. Now,
we have an ostensible ally disporting
itself in mockery of its own proven-
ance, at the expense of any peace. But
humanity is its own egalitarian champi-
on, and we must be prepared for it to
prevail. May we acknowledge our place
in that Party; may we precipitate a
sweeping palisade, of vital accidents.
Joonas Parviainen
ii Slovenia, 2013
iii Berlin, 2014
Franz Schubert
An die musik, D. 547
1817
Ian Bostridge, tenor
Julius Drake, piano
EMI, 2005©
1817
Ian Bostridge, tenor
Julius Drake, piano
EMI, 2005©
A reader wrote in to dispute the complaint in the final paragraph, as if it reflected upon the figure quoted in the first paragraph. This was a mistaken impression, but as sometimes happens, the message could not be answered because no address was furnished. It’s unfortunate; the complaint was a ringing endorsement of what the entry did say.
ReplyDeleteAh, it's a linking problem, I see; the least of our problems, to be sure, over the next four years. Noted, sir, and Happy New Year to you, all the same! :)
DeleteNo, it was distressing to notice that it hadn't been enough to set the stage for that complaint with references to swaggering impostors, impersonating heroism, against which the calm prescriptions of the German Chancellor truly are intended to carry their full prohibitive weight. I cited an essay on this by a leading historian of our time, but I am confident that any reader of newspapers would have observed these qualities in her remarks, as opposed - only yesterday - by the kowtowing of England's current Tory PM, on precisely this issue, to the malign eminence of Trump Tower.
Delete