For a purer extract of Monday ii

morceau d'un berceau tassique




Lars Stephan

St Cecilia's Day

JFK

Heav'n from all creatures hides the book of Fate,
All but the page prescrib'd, their present state;
From brutes what men, from men what spirits know:
Or who could suffer Being here below?
The lamb thy riot dooms to bleed today,
Had he thy Reason, would he skip and play?
Pleas'd to the last, he crops the flow'ry food,
And licks the hand just raised to shed his blood.
Oh blindness to the future! kindly giv'n,
That each may fill the circle marked by Heav'n;
Who sees with equal eye, as God of all,
A hero perish, or a sparrow fall,
Atoms or systems into ruin hurl'd,
And now a bubble burst, and now a world.

Nor was the Work impair'd by Storms alone,
But felt th'Approaches of too warm a Sun;
For Fame, impatient of Extreams, decays
Not more by Envy than Excess of Praise.
Yet Part no injuries of Heav'n could feel,
Like Crystal faithful to the graving Steel;
The Rock's high Summit, in the Temple's Shade,
Nor Heat could melt, nor beating Storm invade.
. .
[This] ever new, nor subject to Decays,
Spread[s], and grow[s] brighter with the length of Days.

Alexander Pope
Yale University Press, 1963©


An Essay on Man, 1734
Epistle I, iii, 77-90


The Temple of Fame, 1711
41-52


Mathias Lauridsen

We are what they drink

Talleyrand expressed extreme astonishment at the apathy of Americans in the face of religious sectarians;

. . but he explained it by assuming that the American ardor of the moment was absorbed in money-making.

It was from Talleyrand that our great anti-imperialist picked up Louisiana. If we thought another generation might see the end of Talleyrand's nightmare, we might just send out for more hooch and wait. 


Watch them, then, watching us. We may drink what we want, but they must drink what we show them. Like revelers in Wagner's Venusberg, we seem to await a Tannhaüser we haven't bred ourselves, to interdict our Calvinist bacchanale. 


  

Watch them, the generation to whom we default and yet suppose to be the engine of our emergence from this admirabile commercium at the same time. In Growing Up Digital, a superb work of journalism from The New York Times today, we read of youths in one of the securest and most bucolic neighborhoods on earth, all but unable to sustain the act of reading.


Henry Adams' History of the United States during the Administrations of Thomas Jefferson is Clio's own text for unraveling our hereditary confusion. It comprises 4 volumes. The Library of America has it in 1. Like his Mont St-Michel and Chartres and The Education, it is a non-negotiable American legacy.

Contemplating St Cecilia's Day tomorrow, we remember Daniel Mendelsohn's explanation of Housman's unyielding fidelity to textual comprehension, as of a natural piece with his allegiances in Shropshire Lad. Abdication is not merely the refusal of an inheritance for oneself; it's a refusal to pass it on. Its renunciation wreaks a widening pool of destruction. How, then, can it be asserted that one values anything, without valuing its destiny? The American orgy will not be lifted by the disinherited. Today's scholars are ours in the most inalienable, undeniable way. 


Who will inherit this land? 
Do you love them?

Henry Adams 
The Jeffersonian Transformation
New York Review Books, 2007©


Georg Frideric Händel
What Art Can Teach
Carolyn Sampson, soprano
An Ode for St Cecilia's Day
Robert King, King's Consort
Hyperion, 2004©

Readings out

Elizabeth Bishop reads a recent poem
by Ivan Terestchenko









Caught - the bubble
in the spirit-level,
a creature divided;
and the compass needle
wobbling and wavering,
undecided.

Freed - the broken
thermometer's mercury
running away;

and the rainbow-bird
from the narrow bevel
of the empty mirror,

   






   flying wherever
   it feels like, gay!






















Photography and Sculpture Terestchenko


Sonnet, Elizabeth Bishop, 1979
Alice Helen Methfessel, 2008©
Library of America, 2008

Mr Jefferson had two estates

Famously, he fretted over his Albemarle County house, Monticello, on a peak of his father's considerable plantation. But he erected yet another neo-Palladian house in Bedford County, called Poplar Forest. If the former was encumbered by obligations to his ambitions, the latter is almost immaculately the domicile of desire. If anything shows the radical modernity of Thomas Jefferson, his prescient ease among the Romantics of the next generation as well as his mastery of the Classicism of his own, it is his indulgence of both dispositions with unanswerable liberty. Wealth, which was minor in his case, had little to do with it. He was a self-empowered man. 

And unfinished, unreconciled. Much of American history flows conflictingly from his delectation of mirror opposites in himself. What the world suffers from our volatile contradictions, oscillated first as pleasure points in his restless ambivalence. Only in architecture was he consistent, and ultimately coherent.

A single-story villa over an English basement, Poplar Forest is Jefferson's most exquisite design. Even more impressive than the luminosity inherent in his octagonal rooms within an octagonal whole, is the rationality of a plan which enables him the flexibility of direct access to every space by the central hall. The siting of Poplar Forest is inferior to Monticello's - as very little isn't - but here he achieved what he wanted, without pretense or hierarchy. If you could design a nation this open, this plain, it would be a republic of peace.

Shrinking, violent

Living in Dixie, one can't help but notice how prolifically our youth pursue earnest missionary excursions abroad - to the Asian subcontinent, Africa - not merely to substantiate their noblesse in a foreign dalliance without entanglements, racking up foreign credits of portfolio-embellishing good works, and maybe expanding one's palate along the way. There is no presumptive hypocrisy in youth's innate impulse to do good, or even in its learned desire to be seen to be good. Is there a native necessity in the export of these shining motives and gestures?

It seems there can be no unambiguous act in a multi-tasking world - as ours has always been, despite the puff in this neologism. But I think the refrain, Look away, Dixie land contains happier and darker elements than that. I never saw such a habit for exporting Protestant good works beyond one's own neighborhood. I don't think it's because the Gothic horrors of the Southern economy and justice system are dismissed as more intractable, say, than Mumbai's. I think it's because it still isn't accepted as "nice" in Dixie, to embarrass the congregation. I've heard this deference described as "communitarian," as To Kill a Mockingbird turned 50.

The Southern Poverty Law Center and the American Civil Liberties Union filed this week a Federal class-action lawsuit against the for-profit corporation which runs Mississippi's largest youth correctional facility. The link tells it all; there is no need for reciting redundantly, here, the allegations in the complaint. If there is anything else going on on this planet which exceeds the depravity detailed in that brief, I very much doubt that it will yield to the enterprising mission of an expatriate pro tempore. That every allegation in the lawsuit  attributes itself to an irresponsibly tax-averse society's out-sourcing of its highest duty, goes a very far way toward explaining why Southern children know so much about the Third World. They are expelled.
 

The adult abdication of the duty of due care, in the remedial incarceration of the young, splits a generation into two faces, exiling them both from each other. How long must this go on, down here? But I stray.

A binge commercial rite called "Thanksgiving" is about to descend upon us, and I grope for some suggestion for enduring it: undergraduates, throughout the South, volunteering to exploit every second of visitation available in that hellhole to check in on one's adopted brother.

Inheritance starts at home. The Walnut Grove Correctional Facility is right down Route 492 from Main Street. At every corner, one's never more than two blocks from Jesus.























Robin Jenkins
A Would-Be Saint
B&W Publishing, 1978©
Rugby, Hulton Deutsch Collection

Le Carré's descent from Graham Greene grows ever more plain

.. which is only to say, from Ford Madox Ford, Mauriac, and Conrad, too. Le Carré prefaced his last book, A Most Wanted Man, with this aphorism from the aristocratic Edwardian philosopher, Friedrich von Hügel, The golden rule is, to help those we love to escape from us.

Morbidly attractive to the adolescent, this precept has been a consideration in the fiction of John Le Carré at least since The Spy Who Came in from the Cold, and by the 80th page of his new novel, Our Kind of Traitor, we are fully aware of its liveliness in this one. A distinctively Roman Catholic perspective, its natural place in the structuring of moral suspense is inherent in a real world of patriotism betrayed by cynicism. Just think, Clarence Thomas is the most qualified man I could possibly name to the Supreme Court, and you have the measure of its application. Between governments and gangsters, Le Carré now reminds us again, only God distinguishes one's treachery from the other's.

With the end of the Cold War this writer's genius for transmitting the pain and certitude of that treachery has only deepened, reaching to Alberich's forge beneath the Rhenish surface. In the present book and the last two, he has leant with devastating vigor on the seduction of the young, in what amounts to a brilliant actuarial progress from Smiley to the ground zero of moral crime, youth at the cusp of entitlement. The place in hell where we are going now is too gorgeously contrasted with where we have been, even to be contemplated except with Le Carré's courage. I dare Barack Obama to read this book.

A brilliantly promising tennis jock mountaineer preceptor in literature - straight out of John Buchan, if the truth be known - and his uncannily pretty barrister girlfriend, reminiscent of Amanda Hesser in Cooking for Mr Latte, escape to Antigua to contemplate their mystifying romantic predicament in the wrong place. (Were this the first time for such a migration, Greece would be landlocked). At worst, you'd expect a quiet annulment down the road, but such things are nastier in Le Carré, possibly for the reason that they're never quiet, in the first place.

Greene used to insist on calling such works, entertainments. A man once sued by Shirley Temple for the candour of a film review could well have chosen a less treacherous term for his illuminations. Le Carré's embrace of that tradition is balsam for storylovers everywhere, and nothing less than patriots deserve.

George Herbert Walker Bush
July 1st, 1991


John Le Carré
Our Kind of Traitor
Viking Penguin
David Cornwell, 2010©

My favourite clothespin

part of an occasional series

the clothespin lends itself to backlighting

best when its materials are translucent, or

when perspective generates an articulate profile.

interior reflection can save the day.

a chorale of static white orthogonals,

suggesting Neutra or Meier, creates an

almost oppressive grid against which

the supple human cloth is rumpled by an

illuminating, underlying torsion.

Photo Jendrejewski

Umschau Verlag, 1984©