In recent postings, it has been my pleasure to cite extracts from two
great peers of the dry martini,
Lord Dacre of Glanton and Dame
Edith Sitwell. An odious aspect of this conduct has been brought to mind by the ministry of my own interior, on the principle that one doesn't tamper with a classic.
An unassailable postulate, so far
as postulates go. The tampering, if
that is what it was, would have had
to be perpetrated by illustration,
so obviously remote from context, as
to act, rather, to insulate text.
Still, our self-collarings are the strictest. I respect their delight.
They are people, such as our-
selves, to whom the gift of
language and its countless
expressive uses was a life-
long joy. It naturally does
strike us as unfair, to adapt
their texts as cartoons for
our illustrative captions.
This, however, is not what
I did, in exploiting Sit-
well's audibly chuckling
reference to Swift's mer-
curial temperament, and
Trevor-Roper's pure hilar-
ity, in reciting an edict
on devotions. If I must
make it more plain that I
cherish their genius for
the lark in their dry, dead-
pan demeanor, I would only
wring graffiti from their
martini, to no good end.
But there is a fraudulent mode,
a collapse of reflection which
we have begun to see again,
in the operations of demagogu-
ery in publications on Crimea.
The worst, we haven't yet seen;
but George F. Will's misapprop-
riation of Timothy Snyder's
ine in Ukraine, revived the
terrorism with only ersatz
crusts of reason. To dress
that grotesquely partisan ser-
mon with one of Mr Faulkner's
masterstrokes of sentiment, on-
ly underscored its shabbiness.
We are born free of this fault,
and see quite through its ghosts.
and see quite through its ghosts.