.. as contradictory as isolation-
ism and internationalism could
sometimes prove themselves to be,
there was a common factor between
them, though only of a negative
character: isolationism existed
in a sphere of timelessness; in-
ternationalism existed in the fu-
ture. Neither existed in the world
of the present. Thus the attitudes
which the young republic had adopt-
ed had not yet satisfactorily sol-
ved the problem .. of how to chart
a course in the world as it was.
There is so much exercise given to
the term, "sorting," in the social
sciences these days, that its vir-
ility in the reclamation of socks
from the laundry room has fallen
almost into desuetude. Be that as
it may, we soldier on, who jetti-
son whole shelves of our library
as we move house, tripping lightly
as we're dripping priceless cash-
meres from a maze of vegan fibers.
I nearly threw out Felix Gilbert
this morning, the fellow whose ob-
servation opens this entry. In the
ostensibly better world to which
all our mobilizations - our sort-
ings - are directed, if in vain, a
disposal of Professor Gilbert is
an opening of the sea cocks in the
hull of human progress. Now, my an-
cient, trusty Harper Torchbook of
the text transcribed above, priced
at 1.25 pre-supply side American
dollars, finds itself back aboard,
illuminating the dawn from one of
its unexcavated layers of wisdom.
Writing in 1961 of General Wash-
ington's time - even then, past -
Gilbert allowed drop an unexamined
paradox which comes in handy in an
age like ours, as binomially ossi-
fied as any since the Third Reich,
which he fled: You're both wrong,
sums it up, pretty nicely for a
Monday. One doesn't read Felix Gil-
bert without gathering the under-
standing of the fatality of fixed
ideas, and of the absurdity of
choosing between hostile illusions.
One could read this insouciant,
not to say nonchalant, paragraph
of his with a nicely poured taste
of morning coffee, and appreciate
the possibilities for serenity.
Felix Gilbert
Princeton University Press
1961©
No comments:
Post a Comment