With scarcely a moment to spare,
America's terminal panel of jur-
ists (it's hard to think of them
as ultimate or highest under cir-
cumstances related, supra) grant-
ed a reprieve yesterday in the
matter of Virginia's mad parade
down the nave of matrimony. Not
on the sage grounds, mind you,
that nobody of any consequence
has ever married in the North-
ern Hemisphere in August, what
with everyone being away; and,
mercifully, not on any knowable
premise at all, but with the ta-
citurnity that becomes a Court
so given to Corporate adoration.
Nothing of the kind. No pensive delectations of the limited liability we enjoy as shareholders in bondings immune from mor-alising intrusion; no wistfulness for sweet depletions we could claim; no stirring celebrations, either, of our sovereign right to select our government.
Nor could now be thought the
time, therefore, for rehear-
sals of a rite deferred. No
one knows quite what to wear
to a Court's last chance to
act the fount of justice in
deference to its duty. But
there isn't any doubt what
it should wear.
The details escape me now, but the feeling of being riven by your words remains vivid. It happened last spring or summer. Something you said—words of searing insight about and commentary on the Supreme Court—stuck with me for several months, informed my thinking and fueled much reflection. Your offhand phrase, "a court so given to Corporate adoration," catches at me, reminds me why I value your efforts here, why I keep returning.
ReplyDeleteWe would all be smaller without spirit such as you volunteer. I know I would not be here.
Delete