I keep coming back to Mrs Clinton's
untiring justification of her habit
for making money from the positions
she adopts, as breaking no law, be-
ing not unlawful; and more and more
I realize, Edward VIII proposed the
breaking of no laws, in involuntary
obsession with the help and support
of the woman he loved. He simply of-
fered such disgrace of his position
that he received advice to renounce
it. I don't know why her tax-exempt
incorporation of a vehicle for good
works should bid to bear comparison
with a lax defense of faith, but as
a lorry for compulsive self-seeking
I can't shake a sense that it does,
against the highest office we have.
Yet, one is asked to ignore it all,
and who doesn't wish they'd let us?
No comments:
Post a Comment