Monday, January 18, 2016

Is your Mrs C the same as my Mrs C?





I know there will be com-
plaints for depicting her
as female; but then there
would be complaints, even
if one hadn't. There will
be complaints for recital
of her marital condition,
but then it would be idle
to ignore the most famous
fact on her dossier. I am
expecting complaints, for
listing your Mrs C before
my Mrs C, as if something
could be wrong with yours
which mine might correct.




But intimidation is not a
happy flux for investiga-
tion between persons, who
may be similarly situated
as innocent onlookers, to
a long, determined strug-
gle to possess an exalted
position. Very few people
have lived so long, as to
recall a time before this
historic project occupied 
its part of the clockface.





Even to ask what lies be-
hind this adventure risks
rebuke for suspicious im-
agery in choice of words.
But intimidation is not a
a chronometric or an iso-
metric function, and even
fades away from substance
it may shade.

This is an intriguing en-
gine that is ready always
to embody governance, for
war, peace; profiteering,
either way, supple in its
coils, to spring upon op-
portunity. Epochs, gener-
ations and their volatile
distinctions fall beneath
its perpetual entitlement.




Is your Mrs C the same as
my Mrs C? I'm put in mind
of the hilarious ruse ar-
ranged by Queen Mary, for
amusing witnesses of that
decapitation which marked
her final triumph. A head
rolled about on the floor
as the axe-man hoisted an
arrestingly brilliant wig.

To this day we ponder: is
it for her head she wants
to be known, or for being
at the center of our gaze?


























Juan Gris
1927

Pablo Picasso
1964

Kirstine Roepstorff
2012

Joan Miró
1930

Garrett Mattingly
The Defeat of the
  Spanish Armada
1959
  Collected in:
John Julius Norwich
A Christmas Cracker
  A Commonplace Selection
Heywood Hill & Co., Ltd, 2015©











Sunday, January 17, 2016

I really must, I think, get dressed with more people






We do, we do. We all re-
turn to the gym after al-
most any indulgence, to
repair some oversight or
other. In my "case," not
that the condition is ex-
actly clinical, I often
resort to the gym to re-
store mental balance, es-
pecially after being out
for any length of time - 
and although I'm sure I'm 
not alone in this motiva-
tion, I don't imagine my
imbalance to be the same
as anyone else's, much
less the same for me, ev-
ery time I return.







Now, the assets of the
gym are such that they
afford a diversity of
restorations; and even
on the mental side, can
be seen to fall into a
variety of classes --
there's an audible side,
to be considered; the
notoriously laborious
side, the sociable and
the sensory, even the
negotiable dispensary,
of various pharmaceuti-
cals. Then there are
the sights common to
every locker room since
the discovery of perspir-
ation, having to do with
getting undressed and al-
so getting dressed again.





It's here, I sense, that
I've lost my way, or pos-
sibly just forgotten some-
thing. Don't we all tend
to our shirtcuffs almost
first, in undressing, and
almost invariably last, in
putting the shirt back on?
Is this just some bizarre
cadence of custom in my own
conduct, possibly rippling
through as some cascade of
side effects? It seems to
me, the gym is the likely
forum for arbitrating my
impression, that there's
something peculiar about
this picture. But if I am
not unnatural in my hand-
ling of a shirt, this man
can neither be dressing,
nor undressing. What, then
explains the shirt?




































Friday, January 15, 2016

Anglicans divide along hemispherical lines





And what else, you were
about to ask, is new? A
gathering at Canterbury
has yielded to market
realities, in the dwind-
ling communion of Angli-
cans, north of Jiddah
and Jakarta. A vibrant
competition for souls
in the nether regions
has inspired a schis-
matic suspension of a
fraternal minority, to
lend credibility to a
promisingly aggressive
evangelism. And hasn't
this just the pitch of
messianic authoritarian-
ism at its scrupulously 
grisly best?





"Divide and conquer" has 
never looked more ironic,
enacting its own metaphor,
as alluringly tectonic. 
A sect, instigated by di-
vorce and disseminated
by expulsion, has shown
it can make any peace it
wants, with opportunism;
is there anything like
schism, to sharpen recti-
tude where it's needed? 
Good luck to them, whit-
tling the cross of com-
passion, for praise as
cut-throats.























William Orpen
T.E. Lawrence
1919










Thursday, January 14, 2016

Smartings


I wonder if a childhood
of younger brothering 
can be cited for a weak-
ness I have for the com-
pany of smarter friends.
I don't know how they
tolerate it, but I sus-
pect that I do by calm-
ly assuming I will grow
some capability eventu-
ally. Never mind, that
actuarily, the talent
meter begins noticeab-
ly to swerve toward the
ranks behind one; the
custom of waiting for
one's anointment has
been established.

Still, now and again
a cinder can find its
way to the eye, and a
morning's spent in
blinking. Of course,
this happens only in
one's swirl. Eliot
and Woolf come with
sirens, masks.

Now I'm glad there
are no fortresses,
no redoubts of un-
surprised reflexes.
One can use a gift. 




                           ..

                           new gods are
                           making deals

                           all the time














Denis Bold
Hinge
  Orpheus Looks Back
  [fragment]
Inverness, 2015©





Wednesday, January 13, 2016

Indispensable New York








  
 Hermes, dear Hermes, Maia's little son,
 I pray to you, the god of thieves and    knaves,
 because I shiver till my teeth resound,
 Please give Hipponax what he deeply    craves!

 Give him a mantle and a shirt to wear.
 And sandals and a pair of furry shoes,
 Sixty gold pieces would not come amiss,
 And any other comfort that I choose!



































Hipponax of Ephesus
Prayer
6th Century BC
Dorothy Burr Thompson
  translation
The Greek Poets
  Homer to the Present
Peter Constantine, Rachel Hadas,
  Edmund Keeley & Karen van Dyck
  editors
Norton, 2010©

Charles S. Raleigh
America
N.Y.Y.C.
1877








Tuesday, January 12, 2016

Clear and clean



This evening, there will be an op-
portunity to listen to the first
President of the United States, ev-
er to seek election on the basis
of securing actual rights which did
not exist until he fought for them
and won them.





Self-quotation is abhorrent, pom-
pous, and rhetorically feeble. But
I cite the opening statement of a
posting I offered in 2012, for the
timeliness of the notice, and dis-
piritingly, for the certainty of
the longevity of its validity. We
are not seeming to desire leaders
like this, and so it would be re-
miss not to remember the claims of
the alternative --


                   At the same time, it is striking, that
              he is implacably opposed by one Party
              which vows to destroy each of these
              rights, and that their policies still
              draw mesmerised attention. Who is anim-
              ated in this land, every day on get-
              ting out of bed, by the prospect of
              destroying someone's life as a matter
              of political satisfaction?


I don't know the answer to that
question, but I know who their
heroes are. I know, too, they've
vowed to disavow a sound modus
vivendi he has structured, lead-
ing a consensus of the world, in
relations with a powerful Gulf
state. I know, they've vowed to
disavow a humane interaction with
a state we've done everything pos-
sible to crush, in our own neigh-
bourhood. I know they loathe the
calm he projects for its stature.
I know they are proud of it all,
and I know they need to harm.

I am listening to this President
exactly his character of official
conduct in my country, one fine
day. My parents saw it, I do not
know whose children will.



















ii  Keith Vaughan
    1939




Monday, January 11, 2016

Seasonal mettle






Friends and I have been trading
thoughts on culinary metallurgy,
as a result of someone's report
of acquiring his first, classic
"heavy-bottomed cast iron pan."
This weighty subject is exactly
the sort of thing that's likely
to sway our speculations in win-
ter especially, given the redis-
covery we tend to make of rooms
and what can be done in them to
resemble an active life. I keep
a rowing machine, as a hedge a-
gainst domestic misadventure, 
but like my friends, I take an
interest in the damage that can
be done in the kitchen.

That confession about cast iron 
threw us all for a loop, seduc-
ing us into a discussion of the
properties of metals, more than
of technique. But it's all much
in line with conjectures about 
compression ratios in engines,
that sustain the allure of cars
outside their carbon footprint.
Moreover, there's something un-
deniably gratifying about being
incorrigible in one's play. And
in proving everything all over
again, pleasantly inconclusive.




Winter, we like to say, doesn't
have to last forever; but while
it's here we know its metabolic
impact shapes the appetite with
tastes that correspond with be-
ing snug. The volatile conduct
of copper and aluminum belongs,
gastronomically, to the instan-
taneous more than to the steep-
ing transformations of ingredi-
ents we savour in this season.

What immortal luck it seems, to
latch on to a cast iron pot, at
the very hour a braise suggests
itself. As one of these friends
remarked almost in passing, it
could even lead to the revival
of butter, cream, and Calvados.





















i, iii  Guillaume Babouin